INDEPENDENT GEMINI GUIDE
Gemini 4 Pro benchmarks: the verified Argon results
Review Google's published Gemini 4 Argon benchmark results, their evaluation methods and what they can tell you about a real workload.
Sources checked . Availability and rankings can change.
The short answer
Google publishes benchmark results for Gemini 4 Argon. We have not verified a separate Gemini 4 Pro benchmark entry. These are provider-published results, not tests performed by this site. Checked October 8, 2026 (Beijing time).
Selected results published by Google DeepMind
The official model page reports the following Argon results. Benchmark versions matter; a score for one version should not be substituted for another.
- DeepSWE v1.1: 77.9%
- FrontierSWE v2: 55.0%
- Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%
- Terminal-bench 4.0: 57.4%
- AutomationBench: 51.3%
- LVBench: 91.7%
Read the methods before declaring a winner
Google's methodology generally uses pass@1 and the highest thinking setting unless specified otherwise. Some results are self-computed and others are taken from benchmark providers. Agent setup, tool access and evaluation conditions vary.
Turn the table into a useful trial
Choose examples from your own work before testing. Record success criteria, completion time, total cost and any human repairs. A repository migration and a short factual answer need different tests. Keep each result alongside its actual settings; averaging unrelated percentages creates a misleading headline score.
Common questions
Are these independent tests by this website?
No. They are attributed to Google's published model page and methodology. This site has not run an Argon benchmark.
Does a high benchmark score guarantee my task will work?
No. Use the relevant benchmark to select a candidate, then evaluate your actual examples and operating constraints.
Check the sources
Argon Budget is an independent resource, not a Google service. We do not provide model access or claim to have reproduced vendor benchmarks.